Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4219 (AP)

Lambu Ravi Teja v. Kumar Viswajeet, I.P.S.

CC/2452/2025 · 2026-07-02

Challa Gunaranjan

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : nil Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 07.07.2026 APHC010472092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2452/2025 Between: 1. LAMBU RAVI TEJA, S/O. LATE YACOBU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE (RETIRED), R/O. D.NO.3-413/1, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, LALACHERUVU, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. KUMAR VISWAJEET I P S, s/o Not known to the Petitioner, Occ Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi at Amaravathi, Guntur District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent for their willful and deliberate violation of the orders made by this Hon'ble Court dated 25.06.2025 made in W.P.No. 15227 of 2025 by his Lordships Hon'ble Sri Justice CHALLA GUNARANJAN Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A K KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. G RAJU The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2452/2025 ORDER: Learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the respondent states that after passing of the interim order, the respondent have issued Memo dated 25.07.2025 disposing the representation of the writ petition inter alia stating that the disciplinary proceedings which were subject matter in W.P.No.6164 of 2022 had been challenged before the Hon’ble Division Bench and the matter is seized up. 2. Today, it is stated that the said writ appeal has been allowed and disciplinary proceedings have been restored and therefore, enquiry is going on. 3. Learned counsel for the contempt petitioner does not dispute the same. 4. In that view of the matter, the contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 03.07.2026 GVK Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 3 98 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CONTEMPT CASE No: 2452 of 2025 Date: 03.07.2026 GVK