- - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625412026 NC: 2026:KHC:51694 WP No. 28490 of 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.28490 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. HANUMANTHARAJU, S/O.HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDENT OF TUBINAKERE VILLAGE, AMRUTHPURA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKUR-572101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALARAJ A C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TUMAKUR SUB-DIVISION, TUMAKURU-572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA ) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625412026 NC: 2026:KHC:51694 WP No. 28490 of 2026 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR IMPLEMENTING THE ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 IN PROCEEDINGS BEARING NO.R.A.20 OF 2023 DATED 22.8.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-E; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard Sri. Balaraja A.C., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner herein has sought for a direction to respondent No.3 to implement the order dated 22.08.2024, produced at Annexure-E passed by respondent No.2. - - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625412026 NC: 2026:KHC:51694 WP No. 28490 of 2026 3 4. A careful consideration of the order passed by respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner at Annexure-E would indicate that the matter has been remitted to respondent No.3- Tahsildar for fresh consideration, based on the material available on record, particularly with regard to the rights of the parties. 5. In that view of the matter, respondent No.3 is directed to reconsider the matter afresh and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law, at the earliest, and in any event, within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 6. In the meanwhile, the respondent-authorities are directed not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner until conclusion of the proceedings before respondent No.3- Tahsildar. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32