Date of reserved for orders : . . . . . . . . . . Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : 07.07.2026 APHC010221962021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 12661/2021 Between: 1. K R R RAJESH, S/O SHAM BABU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC- ADVOCATE R/O YSR NAGAR COLONY,NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, V TOWN POLICE STATION, NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. SHAIK RABI, W/O NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O 17TH LINE,YSR NAGAR COLONY, KOTHUR, NELLORE,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 5. SK MASTAN, S/O NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/O 17TH LINE,YSR NAGAR COLONY, KOTHUR BIT-I, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2 6. SAGAR, S/O NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O MALLAI GUNTA, YSR NAGAR COLONY, KOTHUR BIT-I, NELLORE, 7. SHAIK SHAKIR, S/O NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/O YSR NAGAR COLONY, KOTHUR BIT-I, NELLORE 8. KALYAN KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O YSR NAGAR COLONY, KOTHUR BIT-I, NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondents in not registering the crime pursuant to the Petitioner's complaints dated 17.06.2021 against the 4th to 8th Respondents as illegal and arbitrary and further direct the 3rd Respondent to register the crime pursuant to the Petitioner's complaint IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the 3rd Respondent to register the crime pursuant to the Petitioner's complaint pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Heard Sri Sivaprasad Reddy Venati, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Smt.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. Sri Sivaprasad Reddy Venati, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the matter was compromised, and the grievance in the Writ Petition no longer survives. In view of the same, learned counsel requested to close the Writ Petition, as no further orders are necessary. 3. Smt.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the averment made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is true and that, in view of the said compromise, the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 4. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 02-07-2026 BMS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑