Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42147 (KAR)

SMT. SHANTHAMMA v. RAMALINGAIAH

MFA/4103/2020 · 2026-09-24

S Rachaiah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010173092020 NC: 2026:KHC:52968 MFA No. 4103 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4103 OF 2020 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHANTHAMMA, W/O LATE H. LAKSHMINARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE, I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132. 2. MURALI L., S/O LATE H. LAKSHMANARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE, I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132. 3. VENU L., S/O LATE H. LAKSHMANARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE, I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132. 4. YOGAANDA, S/O LATE H. LAKSHMANARASAPPA, Digitally signed by SUSHMA LAKSHMI B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010173092020 NC: 2026:KHC:52968 MFA No. 4103 of 2020 AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, RESIDENTS OF I.D. HALLI VILLAGE, I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PATEL D. KARE GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RAMALINGAIAH, S/O KADARAPPA, AGE ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O NEERAKALLU VILLAGE, MIDIGESHI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 132. …RESPONDENT ---- THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.11.2019, PASSED IN MVC.NO.1483/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MADHUGIRI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010173092020 NC: 2026:KHC:52968 MFA No. 4103 of 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Case called out. 2. No representation for the parties. 3. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1