Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42135 (PAT)

Goutam Das @ Gautam Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./82901/2025 · 2026-01-05

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82901 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2025 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Goutam Das @ Gautam Kumar S/o Ramjatan Das Resident of Village - Sirajpur Harijan Tola, Ward No. 21, P.S - Parbatta, District - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner assaulted on head of son of informant by means of sickle (hasua). 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, due to previous land dispute, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Petitioner claims clean antecedents. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82901 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he assaulted son of informant with sickle (hasua). The allegations levelled in the F.I.R. find support from the injury report. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T