IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20353 of 2025 ====================================================== Prabhakaran Son of Lalan Kumar Deo, Permanent resident of PNB Gali, Beside Rajdarwar Hotel, Police Station and District- Saharsa. Presently residing at J-3/77, Ground Floor, Left side Khirki EXTN, Shiv Kunj, Malviya Nagar, S.O., P.S.- Malviya Nagar, District- South Delhi, Pin- 110017. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner, Kosi Division, Saharsa. 2. The District Magistrate, Saharsa. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Saharsa. 4. The Circle Officer, Kahra, District- Saharsa. 5. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Saharsa. 6. The Municipal Commissioner, Saharsa. 7. The Forest Divisional Officer, Saharsa, Forest Division, Saharsa. 8. The C.M.D., Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, 4 and 6 Currimbhay Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400001. 9. The Zonal Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Zonal Office, Asiyana Chamber, 3rd Floor, Exhibition Road, Patna-800001. 10. The District Registrar, Saharsa. 11. The Territory Manager (Retail), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Barauni, District- Begusarai. 12. Syed Shamshad Hassain @ Guddu, Son of Late Md. Hasnain, Proprietor of Guddu Nazmi Petrol Pump, Bariyahi Road, Near Tola, Police Station and District- Saharsa. 13. Tarrannum, W/o Syed Shamshad Hassain @ Guddu, The allottee of Proprietor of Guddu Nazmi Petrol Pump, Bariyahi Road, Near Tola, Police Station and District- Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (05) For the State : Mr. Kumar Manish, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Prasad, Adv. For the BPCL : Mr. Rajeev Prakash, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 2 17-02-2026 A perusal of the pleading made in the present writ petition reveals that the petitioner is neither an aggrieved party Patna High Court CWJC No.20353 of 2025(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/2 nor he is one of the applicants who has applied for the RO Dealership. The petitioner appears to a busybody who is seeking cancellation of the license issued in favour of the private respondents herein. The present writ petition in its present form seeking a writ of mandamus cannot be entertained. In case the petitioner is espousing any public cause then he has to file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). 2. Having regard to the same, the present writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) if he is so advised. Gauravkr/- (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) U