Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4213 (AP)

Kasula Vara Lakshmi v. Pothamsetty Venkata Rangamma

CRP/4880/2017 · 2026-07-01

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010484932017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4880/2017 Between: 1. KASULA VARA LAKSHMI, W/O RANGAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, RIO D.NO 67-1-36/20A, N.S.M BACK SIDE, DARSIPET-II, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA-10, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. POTHAMSETTY VENKATA RANGAMMA, W/O LATE ATCHAIAH, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, RIO D.NO 67-1-36/20A, N.S.M BACK SIDE, DARSIPET-II, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA-10, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. POTHAMSETTY KONDALA RAO, S/O LATE ATCHAIAH, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, RIO D.NO 67-1-36/20A, N.S.M BACK SIDE, DARSIPET-II, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA-10, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the order dt. 13/10/2016 in IA.No. 94 of 2016 in OS.no. 337 of 2008 on the file of the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, at Vijayawada IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 6351 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 suspend the order dated 13-10-2016 passed in I.A.No.94 of 2016 in 0.S.No.337 of 2008 on the file of IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada (FTC), pending disposal of the C.R.P and pass such other order or orders which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Civil Revision Petition becomes infructuous. 2. Having so recorded the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 02.07.2026 MNR 4 122 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4880 OF 2017 Dt: 02.07.2026 Mnr