- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010349272021 NC: 2026:KHC:53108 WP No. 17229 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 17229 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SAKAMMA AGED 70 YEARS, W/O LATE THONASAPPA, 2. R.T. NARAYANAPPA AGED 47 YEARS, S/O LATE THONASAPPA, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT RANGAPURA VILLAGE, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 572 137. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ASWATHAPPA D, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY THAVAREKERE POLICE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 001, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by ASHWINI MAYAPPA MAVARAKAR Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010349272021 NC: 2026:KHC:53108 WP No. 17229 of 2021 2. THE THASILDAR SIRA TALUK OFFICE, JYOTHI NAGAR, SIRA, TUMKUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 572 137. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER A.C. OFFICE, MADHUGIRI SUB DIVISION, KSRTC BUS STAND ROAD, MADHUGIRI, KARNATAKA - 572 132. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER D.C. OFFICE, MINI VIDHAN SAUDHA, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA - 572 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FO R1 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/E SEC. 482 OF THE CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO.109-2017 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 420, 465 AND 468 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC SIRA VIDE ANNX A AND B (FIR NO. 109/17 DT: 13.8.17 AND COMPLAINT DT. 12.8.17 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010349272021 NC: 2026:KHC:53108 WP No. 17229 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for some time, memo is filed. Memo reads as under: “In view of the ‘C’ report filed by the police, the matter becomes infructuous and the same may be disposed of with direction to consider the representations for issuance of RTC in favour of the petitioner in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in view of filing of ‘C’ report, representation of the petitioner for issue of pahani/RTC may be considered by the concerned in accordance with law in view of filing of the ‘C’ report. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41