[2026:RJ-JP:15508] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6670/2026 Ramesh Kumar Bairwa S/o Shri Jhuntharam Bairwa, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Sanwat Ka Baas, Mohanpura, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent Of Police, District Jaipur (East). 3. Station House Officer (Sho), Police Station Kanota, Jaipur City (East), Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Collector (Land Revenue Officer), Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sanganer, Jaipur 6. Tehsildar (Land Officer), Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Garg Mr. Kunal Swami Mr. Deepak Mittal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 15/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers :- "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordship may be pleased to accept this writ petition and may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction in the nature thereof: a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the demolition carried out by respondent No.3 on 10.02.2026 as illegal, arbitrary, and void ab initio. b) Issue a writ, order or direction to the respondents, particularly, Respondent No.4 (Collector, Jaipur) and Respondent No.5 (Sub-Divisional Officer, Sanganer, Jaipur), to decide the petitioner's representations [2026:RJ-JP:15508] (2 of 3) [CW-6670/2026] dated 23.03.2026 (Annexure-8 to Annexure-10) within a stipulated time frame; c) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, restraining the respondents from further demolishing or interfering with the petitioner's property in any manner. d) Issue a writ, order or direction to the respondents to pay adequate, compensation to the petitioner for the loss, damage, and mental agony suffered on account of the illegal demolition, and further to quantify the same either through an inquiry or as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit; e) In the alternative, direct the respondents to pay adequate compensation to the petitioner for the loss suffered. f) Direct the respondents to initiate disciplinary/departmental proceedings against respondent No.3 (SHO) for abuse of power and for acting in a manner contrary to law. g) Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner. h) To pass any other order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the light of the facts, circumstances, and in the interest of justice." 2. Mr. Abhishek Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the petitioner has already preferred representations dated 23.03.2026 before the respondents No.4 and 5 for redressal of his grievance and makes a limited prayer that the said respondents be directed to consider and decide the same in a time bound manner, strictly in accordance with law. 3. Taking note of the limited submission so made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without delving into the merits of the matter, respondents No.4 and 5 are directed to decide the representation(s) dated 23.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. [2026:RJ-JP:15508] (3 of 3) [CW-6670/2026] 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s representation(s) and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation(s) in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J VINAY /6