2026:HHC:13003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No. 134 of 2025 Decided on: 22.04.2026 Dr. Manmohini Sharma and another … Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. : Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) In light of the short reply filed by the State, this Court is of the considered view that now the judgment stands complied with in letter and spirit. 2. Ms. Sneh Bhimta, learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioner No. 1 only been paid the leave encashment for 222 days unutilized earned leave which is relatable to the service rendered by her with State of Himachal Pradesh but the respondents have not paid her leave encashment for the unutilized earned leave relatable to the service rendered by her with the State of Jammu and Kashmir. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:13003 3. This Court is of the considered view that as far as this aspect of the matter is concerned, as now the Government of Himachal Pradesh has paid leave encashment to petitioner No. 1 with regard to the unutilized earned leave which was in the credit of the petitioner vis-a-vis rendered by them with Department of Health, Government of Himachal Pradesh, the petitioner should be satisfied. Accordingly, these proceedings are closed with the observation that the judgment stands satisfied. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 22, 2026 (narender)