Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4212 (AP)

VITTALA SHANKARA RAO v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/17591/2022 · 2026-07-02

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010276262022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17591/2022 Between: 1. VITTALA SHANKARA RAO, S/O (LATE) MALLIKARJUNA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, V.R.A., R/O D.NO.4-29, A.SEETHARAMPURAM VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDIVADA DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 5. THE TAHSILDAR, UNGUTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. VISWANADHAPALLI PAPA, W/O NALLAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O OLD LAKSHMI THEATRE BACKSIDE, TELAPROLU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 5 in re- assigning the subject property for an extent of Ac.1-09 cents of agricultural dry land situated in R.S.No.1169/1 of Telaprolu, Unguturu Mandal, Krishna District in favour of the 6th Respondent without following due process of Iaw, without cancelling the previous patta granted in favour of the Petitioner's mother, is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, irregular, violative of fundamental rights as guaranteed under Article 19, 21 and 300A of Constitution and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 5 to cancel the alleged patta said to have been issued in favour of the 6th Respondent in respect of the subject property for an extent of Ac.1-09 cents of agricultural dry land situated in R.S.No.1169/1 of Telaprolu, Unguturu Mandal, Krishna District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfm-e with the Petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property for an extent of Ac.1- 09 cents of agricultural dry land situated in R.S.No.1169/1 of Telaprolu, Unguturu Mandal, Krishna District till disposal of this writ petition and pass 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. V R N PRASHANTH The Court made the following: 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.17591 of 2022 O R DE R: Learned counsel for the Petitioner filed memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as the issue involved in the writ petition is solved subsequent to the filing of the writ petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.07.2026 KLP Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable