Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42115 (KAR)

SRI. C NAGARAJA v. G. RAMAKRISHNA

CRL.P/7742/2020 · 2026-09-23

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010394312020 NC: 2026:KHC:52611 CRL.P No. 7742 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7742 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. C. NAGARAJA S/O CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.18 NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPLE JALAHALLI BENGALURU-560013. 2. SMT. G.V. AMBIKA W/O C. NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.18, NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPLE JALAHALLI BENGALURU-560013. 3. SRI. G. GANGARAJU S/O GANGADRAPPA G. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT KALLINAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE GOWRIBIDANURU CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-561208. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GIRISH M.K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010394312020 NC: 2026:KHC:52611 CRL.P No. 7742 of 2020 AND: 1. G. RAMAKRISHNA S/O CHIKKABYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT OPPOSITE HOUSE OF DRIVER INDIA ENTERPRISE SOLUTION’S LTD., AND GOVT. HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL MADANAYAKANAHALLI MADAVARA POST BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 162. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HARISH H.V., ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., NELAMANGALA IN C.C.NO.83/2017 BY THE ORDER DATED 28.09.2016 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 463 TO 474, 419, 420, 120(B) R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010394312020 NC: 2026:KHC:52611 CRL.P No. 7742 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. 2. This matter is called twice in the morning and also in the afternoon, no representation on both the occasions. This Court vide order dated 29.03.2021 directed learned counsel for the petitioners to furnish copy of the charge sheet and its enclosures. Inspite of more than 5½ years having been elapsed, the same is not furnished. Hence, it shows that learned counsel for the petitioners is not pursuing the matter diligently. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2