Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42112 (MAD)

L. Nandhagopal v. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City,

WP Crl.(MD)/3288/2026 · 2026-06-19

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP CRL.(MD). No.3288 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 19/06/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI WP CRL.(MD). No.3288 of 2026 L. Nandhagopal ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy. 2. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, K.K.Nagar Police Station, Trichy District. 3. K. Murugesan ... Respondents PRAYER :- To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to life and limb of the petitioner as well as his family members and further to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct an enquiry based on my representation dated 13.05.2026 and vide CSR Receipt No.39 of 2026 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3288 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr. P.Balasubramanian, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to life and limb of the petitioner as well as his family members and further to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct an enquiry based on my representation dated 13.05.2026 and vide CSR Receipt No.39 of 2026 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had sent a representation seeking action against the third respondent, who is an Engineer. The petitioner has entered into an agreement with the third respondent for construction of his house. Due to misunderstanding between the petitioner and the third respondent, the construction work was stopped without completion. The third respondent has started to threaten the petitioner, seeking money. Therefore, the petitioner has given a complaint before the second 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3288 of 2026 respondent. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition is filed. 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the third respondent, notice to him is dispensed with. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the first respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.05.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 19.06.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no pnn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3288 of 2026 L. VICTORIA GOWRI,J pnn To 1. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy. 2. The Inspector of Police, K.K.Nagar Police Station, Trichy District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN WP CRL.(MD) No.3288 of 2026 Date : 19/06/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis