Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42101 (PAT)

Sajan Kumar @ Tabla @ Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./83743/2025 · 2026-02-11

Arun Kumar Jha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83743 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2018 Thana- MUSAHARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sajan Kumar @ Tabla @ Suraj Kumar S/o Late Vinod Mahto Resident of village and Post - Madhopur, P.S.- Mushahari, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raju Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shubham Samrat, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 4 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mushahari P.S. Case No. 233 of 2018, registered for the offences under Sections 413, 414/34 of the IPC. 3. As per the prosecution case, coaccused Rakesh Kumar was apprehended with stolen motorcycle and on his instance further another stolen motorcycle was recovered. The coaccused named this petitioner from who he has purchased the stolen motorcycle. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83743 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 in this case and he has not committed any offence. Except for confessional statement of coaccused, there is no material against this petitioner. Moreover, the coaccused has named Suraj Kumar with specific mobile number but the police did not investigate the matter so as to ascertain the petitioner is the same Suraj Kumar having the same mobile number. The petitioner is in custody since 02.10.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted. The petitioner has antecedent of one case. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. 6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the submission of charge sheet and period of custody, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Muzaffarpur East/concerned court, in connection with Mushahari P.S. Case No. 233 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83743 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court. (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. Anuradha/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T