Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4210 (PAT)

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./12319/2026 · 2026-04-30

Rajesh Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12319 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2023 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Yadav S/o- Awadhesh Yadav Vill- Moh Chero PS- Sarmera District- Nalanda Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Richa, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP For the Informant : Mr. Akash Raj, Advocate : Mr. Pratik Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 30-04-2026 Heard Ms. Richa, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State and Mr. Akash Raj, learned counsel for the Informant. 2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 14.07.2025 in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 123 of 2023, FIR dated 17.06.2023 registered for the offence under Section 147, 148, 149, 341, 326, 307, 504, 325, 324, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. 3. According to the prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 17.06.2023 at about 8.00 P.M when the father of the informant was returning from Musahari Tola and reached near the shop of Mado Yadav, then the petitioner along with other accused persons suddenly caught him and thrashed him on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12319 of 2026(3) dt.30-04-2026 2/3 the ground. On hearing hulla, the informant reached there and saw that the accused persons cut both the hands of his father from the portion of the wrist from gadasa. Other accused persons grabbed his father and when the informant raised alarm the accused persons fired at him. Other person of village came to save them and then the accused persons fled away. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. She next submits that due to some petty dispute the present occurrence has taken place and there was no intention to kill anyone and the petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 14.07.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted to the father of the informant. Furthermore, the injury report of the injured person indicates amputation below the elbow of both forearms, caused by a hard and sharp object. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as nature of allegation supported by medical evidence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12319 of 2026(3) dt.30-04-2026 3/3 connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 123 of 2023, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda. 7. Prayer is refused. Suruchi/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T