Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42082 (KAR)

SRI ASHOK KHENY v. SRI ABRAHAM T J

WP/52798/2016 · 2026-09-23

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12236 WP No. 52798 of 2016 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 52798 OF 2016 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. ASHOK KHENY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O SRI. MAHARUDRAA, NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE, MIDFORD GARDENS, M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.B. MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. ABRAHAM T.J, MAJOR IN AGE, S/O JOSEPH T.A, R/O 2457, 16TH B MAIN, H.A.L 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 038. …RESPONDENT THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 31.8.2016 (ANNEXURE-A) IN SO FAR AS ALLOWING IA NOS. IV TO VII FILED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN TO REOPEN THE CASE RECALL THE ORDER AND CONSEQUENTLY TAKE HIS WRITTEN STATEMENT OF RECORD HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12236 WP No. 52798 of 2016 2 BY CONDONING THE DELAY, IN OS NO.8591/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDL CITY AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-15) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER 1. The record reflects that the respondent was directed to comply with the office objections, within two weeks as a final chance on 02.06.2025 by this Court. 2. The Report of the Registry is ‘the compliance has not been done’. 3. The petition is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE JJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA