IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75315 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2025 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Manoj Das S/O Chotu Das, R/O Village- Samir Takiya, Ravidas Tola, P.S- Rampur, District- Gaya 2. Rajeev Das @ Rajeev Kumar, S/O Bigan Ravidas, R/O Village- Samir Takiya, Ravidas Tola, P.S- Rampur, District- Gaya. 3. Nikhil Kumar, S/O Bigan Ravidas, R/O Village- Samir Takiya, Ravidas Tola, P.S- Rampur, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83380 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2025 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Anuj Das, S/o Chhotu Das, R/o Village- Sahmir Takiya, P.S.- Rampur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 75315 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83380 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 4 11-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rampur P.S. Case no.47 of 2025, registered under sections 109(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 74, 352, 351, 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75315 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the sixteen named accused persons including the four petitioners herein came variously armed and assaulted her husband who fell unconscious. It is further stated that her son was assaulted by the four petitioners herein seriously injuring him. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. So far as the allegation of assault on the husband (since deceased) of the informant is concerned, the same is specific on five named co-accused who are not the petitioners herein. So far as the allegation of the petitioners having assaulted the son of the informant is concerned, no injury report is available either in the case diary nor does it find mention in the order of the learned trial Court. The petitioners are in custody since 17.7.2025 and 20.5.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the allegations in the F.I.R., the assault on the deceased not being on the petitioners herein and the petitioners having Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75315 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 remained in custody for more than 6 months and charge-sheet having been submitted in the case, all the four petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rampur P.S. Case no.47 of 2025, on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Cr. Misc. no.75315 of 2025 and learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-XVI, Gaya in Cr. Misc. no.83380 of 2025. avinash/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T