Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2905 OF 2025 (MV-I)
C/W
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2661 OF 2025 (MV-I)
IN MFA No. 2905/2025 BETWEEN:
MAHANTHESH N.
S/O NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.68, DOREHATTI ROAD, BEHIND HIGH SCHOOL, NANNIVALA POST, CHALLAKERE TQ, CHITRADURGA - 577 522. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. TEJASWINI K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KALLESH K.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
VEERABHADRAPPA M.
S/O MALLESHAPPA, AGE MAJOR, R/AT NO.88/6, RUDRESHWARA NILAYA, A DIVISION, GANAPATHI TEMPPLE ROAD, HOLALKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA - 577 526.
Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
2.
THE LEGAL MANAGER NATIONAL GENARAL INAURANCE CO. LTD, NO.25/1, 2ND FLOOR, BUILDING NO.2, SHANKARANARAYANA BUILDING, M.G ROAD, BANGALORE - 01. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S. MARULAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
VIDE ORDER DATED 13.02.2026, NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS MFA FILED IS U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.01.2025 PASSED IN MVC NO.2406/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU (SCCH-25), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
IN MFA NO. 2661/2025 BETWEEN:
1.
THE LEGAL MANAGER NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NO.25/1, 2ND FLOOR, BUILDING NO.2, SHANKARANARAYANA BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, NO.144, SHUBRAM COMPLEX, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. G.S. MARULAIAH, ADVOCATE) Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
AND:
1.
MR. MAHANTHESH N.
S/O NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/A #68, DOREHATTI ROAD, BEHIND HIGH SCHOOL, NANNIVALA POST, CHALLKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT -577 522.
2.
SRI. VEERABHADRAPPA M.
S/O MALLESHAPPA, AGE MAJOR, R/AT NO.88/6, RUDRESHWARA NILAYA, A DIVISION, GANAPATHI TEMPLE ROAD, HOLALKERE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 526. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. TEJASWINI K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KALLESH K.,ADVOCATE) THIS MFA FILED IS U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.01.2025 PASSED IN MVC NO.2406/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-25), AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.5,45,800/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF DEPOSITING THE AMOUNT.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Miscellaneous First Appeal No.2905/2025 is filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded in MVC No.2406/2024 and Miscellaneous First Appeal No.2661/2025 is filed the insurer challenging the liability and quantum of compensation awarded in the
Judgment and Award dated 13.01.2025 passed in MVC No.2406/2024 by XXIII Additional Small Causes Judge and MACT, Bengaluru (SCCH-25).
2. The claimant made a claim petition seeking for award of compensation for the injury sustained by him in a road traffic accident occurred on 15.10.2023 contending that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of lorry bearing registration No.KA-16-J-8316.
3. The Tribunal recorded the evidence adduced by the parties and upon appreciating the evidence on record, Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
assessed the compensation and awarded the compensation under various heads as under: Sl. No. Particulars
Amount
1. Pain and suffering Rs. 80,000/-
2. Medical expenses Rs. 63,349/-
3. Loss of income during laid up period Rs. 16,000/-
4. Loss of future income Rs. 3,26,400/-
5. Loss of future amenities and happiness Rs. 20,000/-
6. Attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment charges Rs. 20,000/-
7. Future medical expenses Rs. 20,000/-
Total
Rs. 5,45,749/- (Rounded off to Rs.5,45,800/-)
4. The Tribunal has also awarded the interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation and
directed the insurer to pay the compensation awarded with interest. The insurer has challenged the liability and quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. The claimant has filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 6 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
5. Heard the learned counsel for the claimant and
learned counsel for the insurer.
6.
Learned counsel for the insurer would contend that, the claimant was riding the motorcycle and was not maintaining the sufficient distance and when the insured lorry applied brake, he dashed on the back side of the lorry and sustained injuries. As the claimant has not maintained sufficient distance between his motorcycle and the lorry, the entire negligence is on the part of the rider of the motorcycle who is the claimant. On that point, he placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of NISHAN SINGH AND OTHERS vs.
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS reported in (2018) 6 SCC 765 and in the case of ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs.
TATE AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS. reported in 2026 INSC 208. Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 7 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
7. He further submits that, the claimant has taken treatment in BGS Hospital, Bengaluru, after six (06) months of the accident and the said treatment is for some other ailments and therefore award of compensation towards medical expenses as noted in Ex.P7 - bills is not proper. The compensation awarded on all heads is on higher side and set aside the Judgment and Award passed by the Tribunal. With these, he prayed to allow the appeal.
8.
Learned counsel for the claimant would contend that, the accident occurred during night hours at about 9:45 p.m. The lorry suddenly applied brake and there was no brake lights on the rear side of the lorry and therefore, the rider of the motorcycle dashed against back side of the lorry and sustained injuries.
9. The charge sheet has been filed against driver of the lorry and in the criminal case, he has pleaded guilty and convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 337 of Indian Penal Code and he had paid fine. Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 8 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
The said aspect itself clearly indicates that driver of the lorry drove in a rash and negligent manner and caused the accident.
10.
Learned counsel for the claimant further submits that, the Tribunal has only awarded bills amount of Ex.P7, but has not awarded the bills amount of Ex.P11. Ex.P.11 - bills pertains to the treatment taken by the claimant in hospital at Chitradurga. The compensation awarded towards pain and sufferings, loss of amenities and loss of income during laid up period are on lower side. She further submits that, the Tribunal based on the evidence of Doctor - P.W.2 has rightly taken the disability at 10% and awarded loss of future income due to disability. She also submits that, the notional income fixed for the year 2023 by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority is Rs.16,250/- and the said income is to be taken as against Rs.16,000/- taken by the Tribunal. The claimant has to undergo surgery for removal of implants and considering the same, the compensation awarded Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 9 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
towards future medical expenses is on lower side. With these, she prayed to allow the appeal filed by the claimant and enhancement of compensation.
11. Having heard the learned counsel for insurer and learned counsel for claimant, the Court has perused the impugned Judgment, Award and Trial Court records.
12. The following points are raised for
consideration:
I) Whether the Tribunal is justified in holding
that the accident has been caused due to
rash and negligent driving of the driver of
lorry bearing registration No.KA-16-J-8316? II) Whether the compensation awarded by the
Tribunal is just and proper? REASONS
13. POINT NO.I : The accident occurred on 15.10.2023 at about 9:45 p.m. and the accident occurred during night hours. Driver of the lorry bearing registration No.KA-16-J-8316 which was proceeding ahead of the claimant's motorcycle and suddenly stopped the lorry by Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 10 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
applying brake and the claimant who was riding motorcycle dashed against the said lorry and sustained injuries. What was the distance between lorry and motorcycle of the claimant has not been brought on record in the cross-examination of P.W.1. The insurer and insured have not lead any evidence that rash and negligent driving is on the part of the rider of motorcycle. Ex.P2 - Charge sheet and it is filed against driver of the lorry for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 337 of Indian Penal Code. The criminal case has been registered against driver of the lorry based on the said charge sheet in C.C.No.1189/2023. Driver of the lorry has pleaded guilty and has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 338 of Indian Penal Code and the copy of order is at Ex.P10. The very said aspect clearly establishes the rash and negligent driving is on the part of driver of the lorry. 14. The judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the insurer in the case of NISHAN SINGH Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 11 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
AND OTHERS supra, the facts indicate that there was a specific distance between the Maruti Car and the Truck is about ten (10) to fifteen (15) feet and it is held to be not a safe distance. 15.
15. The judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the insurer in another case i.e., ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED supra, the cleaner of the Truck was the claimant has specifically stated that the driver of Truck could not control the Truck due to high speed and dashed against the vehicle moving ahead i.e., Trailor and the Truck was moving at a distance of 20 feet from the Trailor. In those cases, the evidence indicated the distance between two vehicles. 16. In the case on hand, there is no evidence forthcoming as to what was the distance between the lorry and motorcycle of the claimant. Therefore, the said two decisions are not applicable with the facts of the present case on hand. Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 12 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
17. P.W.1 - Claimant has specifically stated that he was moving slowly and driver of the lorry suddenly applied brake and brake lights were not on and he went and dashed to the lorry as he not saw the lorry due to night hours. Considering the said aspect, it is clear that the entire negligence is on the part of the driver of lorry and the Tribunal has rightly held so. Accordingly, point No.I is answered. 18. POINT NO.II : The claimant has sustained displaced fracture of left clavicle as per Ex.P5 - Wound Certificate. Considering the said injury, the compensation awarded towards pain and suffering in a sum of Rs.80,000/- is just and proper. So also, the compensation awarded towards loss of amenities in a sum of Rs.20,000/- is just and proper. The claimant has been admitted in hospital for six (06) days and considering the same, the compensation awarded towards attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment charges in a sum of Rs.20,000/- is just and proper. Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 13 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
19. The notional income fixed for the year 2023 by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority is Rs.16,250/- and the said income is to be taken as against Rs.16,000/- taken by the Tribunal. 20.
P.W.2 - Doctor has examined the claimant, assessed the disability and stated that the claimant has sustained disability of upper limb at 30% and whole body at 10%. Considering the age of the claimant as thirty (30) years, the multiplier applicable is '17'. In view of the same, loss of future income due to disability is calculated as under:
Rs.16,250/- X 12 X 17 X 10% = Rs.3,31,500/-. 21. Considering the occupation of the claimant as electrician and the fracture sustained, the claimant has to take rest atleast for two (02) months and therefore, he is entitled to loss of income during laid up period in a sum of Rs.32,500/- (Rs.16,250/- X 02 months) as against Rs.16,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 14 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
22. The Tribunal has only awarded medical expenses of Rs.63,349/- based on the bills produced under Ex.P7. There are other bills contained in Ex.P11, but there is no evidence for the said bills. Therefore, the claimant is not entitled to medical expenses as per Ex.P11 - bills. 23. P.W.2 - Doctor has stated that the claimant has to undergo surgery for removal of implants and therefore, he is entitled to future medical expenses in a sum of Rs.30,000/- as against Rs.20,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. 24. Considering all the above aspects, the claimant is entitled to total compensation under various heads as under: Sl. No. Particulars
Amount
1. Pain and suffering Rs. 80,000/-
2. Medical expenses Rs. 63,349/-
3. Loss of income during laid up period Rs. 32,500/-
4. Loss of future income due to disability Rs. 3,31,500/-
5. Loss of amenities Rs. 20,000/- Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 15 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
6. Attendant and conveyance charges Rs. 20,000/-
7.
Future medical expenses Rs. 30,000/-
Total Rs. 5,77,349/-
25. The claimant is entitled to total compensation of Rs.5,77,349/- as against Rs.5,45,800/- awarded by the Tribunal with interest. 26. Consequently, the claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.31,549/- (Rs.5,77,349/- - Rs.5,45,800/-) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation. 27. The insurer is liable to pay the said enhanced compensation amount with interest. 28. In view of the above, the following:
ORDER i) Miscellaneous First Appeal No.2661/2025 filed by the insurer is dismissed. ii) Miscellaneous First Appeal No.2905/2025 filed by the claimant is allowed-in-part. Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 16 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010262372025 NC: 2026:KHC:52598 MFA No. 2905 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 2661 of 2025
iii) The claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.31,549/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation. iv) The insurer shall deposit the enhanced compensation amount with interest before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from this day. v) The claimant is entitled to release of entire enhanced compensation with interest. vi) The amount in deposit is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal.
(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30 Digitally Signed By:
SHIVASHANKAR BASAPPA AMARANNAVAR JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA