Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42065 (CAL)

ANIRBAN SENGUPTA v. BHOLA SONKAR

CO/3199/2026 · 2026-09-17

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 17.09.2026 (AD 10) (S. Banerjee) CO 3199 of 2026 Sri Anirban Sengupta Vs. Sri Bhola Sonkar Mr. Amrita Lal Dhar Ms. Puja Sonkar …for the petitioner Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the defence of the opposite-party against delivery of possession has been struck off under Section 7(3) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. He submits that the PW-1 was examined and cross-examined in full and was subsequently discharged. The immediate grievance of the petitioner is that instead of fixing the suit for argument, a date has been fixed for evidence of the defence witness. After some argument learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that considering the fact that the next date is fixed on October 1, 2026, liberty be given to the petitioner to approach the learned trial judge that a prayer for fixing a date for argument instead of evidence of the defence witness. 2 This revisional application stands disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application. If such an application is filed on or before September 25, 2026 upon prior service of a copy of the same to the learned advocate representing the opposite-party before the learned trial judge, the said application shall be taken up for hearing by the learned trial judge on October 1, 2026 and disposed of in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the respective parties. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)