Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42062 (KAR)

SMT.LAKSHMI NARASAMMA R v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/17274/2022 · 2026-09-22

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010391442022 NC: 2026:KHC:52288 WP No. 17274 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 17274 OF 2022 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMI NARASAMMA R., W/O J C NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/AT NO.16, NEAR LIC COLONY MOHAN KUMAR NAGAR YESHAWANTHAPURA BENGALURU-560 022. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH KUAMR V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAURA DISTRICT CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010391442022 NC: 2026:KHC:52288 WP No. 17274 of 2022 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION CHIKKABALLAPURA CITY - 562 101. 4. SRI. GOPALA REDDY S/O LATE KOTE LINGAREDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 5. SMT SATHYAVATHI W/O GOPALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.4 AND 5 ARE R/AT NO.220, N BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560 010. 6. SRI CHIKKANNA S/O LATE YARRAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 7. SRI KRISHNA MURTHY S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.6 AND 7 ARE R/AT AGALAGURKI VILLAGE NANDI HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK - 562 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; V/O DATED 08.08.2023, NOTICE TO R4 AND R5 IS DISPENSED WITH; SRI. PARASHURAM R. HATTARAKIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R6 AND R7) - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010391442022 NC: 2026:KHC:52288 WP No. 17274 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Ramesh Kumar.V., counsel on behalf of Sri.Narayana Swamy.P.M., for the petitioner; Smt.Savithramma., AGA for respondents 1 to 3 and Sri.Parashuram.R.Hattarakihal., counsel for respondents 6 & 7 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about infructuous of the petition. The oral submission is placed on record. The Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010391442022 NC: 2026:KHC:52288 WP No. 17274 of 2022 Because of disposal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28