Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42056 (KAR)

SMT. PADMAMMA v. PRATHAPGIRI

WP/28927/2026 · 2026-09-22

K V Aravind

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010634392026 NC: 2026:KHC:52782 WP No. 28927 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 28927 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PADMAMMA W/O. LATE LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 2. VENKATEGOWDA SHIVAKUMAR, S/O. LATE LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 3. PRATHAP S/O. LATE LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, ALL RESIDENTS OF PURADADODDI VILLAGE, HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R.V. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. PRATHAPGIRI S/O. LATE LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010634392026 NC: 2026:KHC:52782 WP No. 28927 of 2026 2. RASHMI D/O. LATE LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 3. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA W/O. LATE LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF BANASAMUDRA VILLAGE, NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE, KASABA HOBLI -2, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, PIN CODE 571 430. 4. SMT. GIRIGAMMA, W/O. LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, 5. SMT. SUGUNA, D/O. LATE RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS. 6. VENKATESHA S/O. LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 7. SMT. PADMAMMA, D/O. LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 8. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, D/O. LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 9. SRINIVASA, S/O. LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010634392026 NC: 2026:KHC:52782 WP No. 28927 of 2026 RESPONDENTS 4 TO 9 R/O. T. K. HALLI VILLAGE, HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421 10. ERAJU S/O. LATE HUCHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 11. SMT. PREMA D/O. LATE KULLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 12. SMT. LAKSHMI D/O. LATE KULLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 13. SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O. LATE VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 14. KUMAR S/O. LATE VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 15. CHINNASWAMY S/O. LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, 16. SMT. GURULAKSHMAMMA, W/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 17. SURESHA S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 18. KRISHNA S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010634392026 NC: 2026:KHC:52782 WP No. 28927 of 2026 19. GOPI S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 10 TO 19 RESIDENTS OF PURADADODDI VILLAGE, HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421. 20. SMT. SHARADAMMA D/O. LATE JAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 21. BASAVARAJU S/O. LATE JAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 22. NAGARAJU S/O. LATE JAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 20 TO 22 RESIDENTS OF MARIJOGIDODDI VILLAGE, HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421. 23. SMT. VENKATAMMA, D/O. LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AND W/O. CHIKKATHAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 23 R/O. T. K. HALLI VILLAGE, HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421. 24. SMT. SHRUTHI W/O. KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010634392026 NC: 2026:KHC:52782 WP No. 28927 of 2026 25. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. CHINNASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 24 & 25 RESIDENTS OF PURADADODDI VILLAGE, HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT 571 421. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE CASE, O. S. NO.35/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MALAVALLI, AND AFTER LOOKING INTO THE LEGALITY AND VALIDITY OF THE ORDER DATED 22-06-2022 PASSED ON I.A. NO.4 IN O. S. NO. 35/2022, ANNEXURE-A, BY THE COURT OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MALAVALLI, SET ASIDE THE SAME AND FURTHER DISMISS THE SUIT AS NOT MAINTAINABLE, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010634392026 NC: 2026:KHC:52782 WP No. 28927 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Office has raised objection with regard to maintainability. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file Civil Revision Petition. 3. Subject to liberty as prayed for, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable. If a request is made for returning of certified copies, the registry shall return the same, after retaining xerox copies of same. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE VP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 145