Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42036 (KAR)

STATE OF KARNATAKA v. ANNAMA DEVARA DEVASTHANA

WA/2969/2014 · 2026-09-24

K Manmadha Rao, R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010029732014 NC: 2026:KHC:52768-DB WA No. 2969 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO. 2969 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT, (ENDOWMENTS AND MUZRAI), M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND MUZRAI OFFICER, RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE, TRUSTS, BANGALORE NORTH SUB -DIVISION, BANGALORE-01. 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND MUZRAI COMMISSIONER, RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE TRUSTS, BANGALORE-1. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. VAHEEDA., AGA) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010029732014 NC: 2026:KHC:52768-DB WA No. 2969 of 2014 AND: 1. ANNAMA DEVARA DEVASTHANA 12, SUBEDAR CHATRAM ROAD, BANGALORE-9, REP. BY C.D. RAJANNA MAJOR, S/O CHIKKA DASAPPA, R/O KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-34. 2. V. ANNAYYAPPA MAJOR, S/O VENKATARAMANNA A, 20, CHANNARAYASWAMY TEMPLE STREET, BANGALORE-02. 3. VENKATAPPA MAJOR, S/O PUTTAPPA, R/O KODIGEHALLI, BANGALORE SOUTH 4. V. LAKSHMINARAYANA MAJOR, S/O VENKATARAMANA A, 29, MAKKALA BASAVANNA TEMPLE STREET, NAGARTHPET, BANGALORE-02. 5. V. ANANTHA MAJOR, S/O VENKATACHALAPATHY, 29, MAKKALA BASAVANNA TEMPLE ROAD, NAGARTHPET, BANGALORE-02 - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010029732014 NC: 2026:KHC:52768-DB WA No. 2969 of 2014 6. K.V. PRAKASH MAJOR, S/O VENKATARAMANAPPA, R/O KODIGEHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. 7. R. RAMPRASAD MAJOR, S/O SHAMANNA, R/O CHANNARAYASWAMY TEMPLE STREET, NAGARTHPET, BANGALORE. 8. 9. SRI ANNAMMADEVARU DEVASTHANA REPRESENTED BY SMT. V. RAJAMMA, W/O LATE A.VENKATARAMA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDENT AT NO.5, P.V. NAIK LANE, THIGALARAPET, NAGARTHPET CROSS, BANGALORE-02. SRI.PUTTARAJU.J AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O JAYARAM.M R/A NO.199, BEHIND PATALAMMA TEMPLE KODIGEHALLI, SAHAKARANAGARA POST BANGALORE-560092. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.S.J.KUMAR & N PAPANNA., ADVOCATES FOR R3 (A-C) SRI. P.M.NARAYANASWAMY & HARSHAVARDHANA N., ADVOCATE FOR R6 MS. NANDINI.A., ADVOCATE FOR NAYANA TARA B.G., ADVOCATE FOR R7 & ALSO FOR R2, R5(NOC) SRI. ESHWAR R NAIK ON IAS3/25 FOR BRINGING P’SD FOR R9) - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010029732014 NC: 2026:KHC:52768-DB WA No. 2969 of 2014 THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.21096/2002 C/W 22972/2002 DATED 8/4/2009. CF INSUFFICIENT/SUFFICIENT APPEAL IN TIME/OUT OF TIME FOLLOWING OFFICE OBJECTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH EVEN AFTER LAPSE OF THREE WEEKS TIME THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS and HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS) Learned Counsel Smt.Nayanatara B.G., submits that despite orders being passed by this Court on 17.09.2025, taking note of the memos dated 25.07.2025 and 02.08.2025 filed by the learned Counsel and overruling the office objections while clearly stating that since the memos are only reporting the death of respondents No.2 and 5, it is the responsibility of the appellants to move appropriate applications, if so advised, office note is once again put up. 2. The appeals were also dismissed as abated as against the deceased respondents. Nevertheless, office - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010029732014 NC: 2026:KHC:52768-DB WA No. 2969 of 2014 has been showing the non-compliance of the office objections raised on the memos. 3. We have gone through the order dated 17.09.2025. 4. This Court by the said order has directed that it is for the appellants to file necessary applications to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondents on record. The appeals were already dismissed as abated as against the said deceased respondents, but till date no action has been taken by the appellants. 5. Consequently, the Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE DL CT: JL