IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.65 of 2026 ====================================================== Ram Shankar Kumar, S/o- Ramadas Paswan, Resident of Jaitpur, P.S.- Barhiya, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Chief Secretary of Bihar Secretariate, Patna. 3. The Principal Secretary of Bihar, through Urban Development and Housing Department, Secretariate, Patna. 4. Joint Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Secretariate, Patna. 5. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai. 6. Deputy Commissioner, Establishment, Lakhisarai. 7. District Officer, SC and ST Department, Lakhisarai. 8. Urban Executive Officer, Urban Council, Lakhisarai. 9. Acting Assistant Principal Secretary cum Co-Accountant Urban Council, Lakhisarai. 10. Acting Cashier, Urban Council, Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajnish Chandra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikas Kumar, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 09-01-2026 The present writ petition has been filed in the form of a Public Interest Litigation for the following reliefs:- “(a) For issuance of writ in the nature certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 8/5/25 issued by the Resp. No.5 to 8, and the nature of Mandamus or any other order/orders direction/directions to ask the respondents authorizes as to why the such type of Patna High Court CWJC No.65 of 2026(2) dt.09-01-2026 2/3 decision taking by the Resp. No.5 to 8 to appoint double generation second phase of compassionate ground to second time vide order dated 24.04.2025 under proposal: (i) Reshmi Devi (Peon) (ii) Ajay Kumar (Sweeper) (iii) Mahesh Mandal (Tax Collector). (b) For this the Hon'ble Court is further prayed to give direction to the respondents authorities when the Ist generation of already appointed previously on the Ground of Compassionate appointment then after death Second time also appointed on compassionate appointment to the para (a) employees are arbitrary, malafide intension contrary to eradicate the employment and violated the Rules and Regulations of Compassionate appointment because no provision to consideration of Second Generation to create Lawlessness action by Resp. no.5 to 8 to appoint the three persons in the phase of second time against the Rules and circular of the Bihar Govt. (c) For issuance of writ/writs, order/orders direction/directions against the respondents authorities as to why the violation of rules, circular of compassionate appointment over looked no provision of appointment of Second Generation dependents family members after second time death of any employees. (d) For that it is against the violation of rules and regulation and against the circular of Bihar Govt. and it is against the violation of Article 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. (e) For issuance of writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions against the respondents authorities to disobey the Govt. orders. (f) For issuance of any other writ/writs, Patna High Court CWJC No.65 of 2026(2) dt.09-01-2026 3/3 direction/directions, order/orders for writ.” 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sujit/- (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) U