Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42015 (MAD)

Sri Selvakumaran Enterprises v. Assistant Commissioner (ST)

WP/23249/2026 · 2026-06-30

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 23249 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 23249 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.25214 & 25216 of 2026 Tvl. Sri Selvakumaran Enterprises Rep. by its Proprietor Mr. Kumaravel, No.22/3/3, 5th Street, Thiru Nagar, Vadapalani, Chennai 600 026 ..Petitioner(s) Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) Vadapalani Assessment Circle, No.1, Greams Road, Ground Floor, PAPJM Annex Building, Chennai-600 006 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent vide Reference No. ZD3303262656970 dated 29.03.2026 along with the detailed order as annexure and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): M/S. Mansoor Ilahi For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ********** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23249 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 29.03.2026 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that the tax proposal was affirmed on the ground that the petitioner had not replied to the show cause notice or participated in hearings. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner consents to remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. He has made an endorsement to that effect on the bundle. 5. Subject to the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order dated 29.03.2026 is set aside and the matter is remanded for re- consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of petitioner making the remittance of 10% of disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23249 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 30-06-2026 (1/4) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To Assistant Commissioner (ST) Vadapalani Assessment Circle, No.1, Greams Road, Ground Floor, PAPJM Annex Building, Chennai-600 006 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23249 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 23249 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.25214 & 25216 of 2026 30-06-2026 (1/4) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis