Date of reserved for orders : . . . . . . . . . Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 07.07.2026 APHC010094742021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2043/2021 Between: 1. JAKKALA SRIHARI, S/O. LATE VENKATA RAO, AGED 44 YRS, OCC.EMPLOYEE, R/O.PAYAKARAOPETA, VISAKHAPATANAM ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. 2. JAKKALA BALA SRILAKSHMI, W/O. SRIHARI, AGED 40 YRS, R/O.PEDAPATANAM AGRAHARAM D/O.DAKE VNKANNA, PEDAPATANAM AGRAHARAM MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. JAKKALA BABU UN NAMED S/, S/O.SRIHARI, AGED 6 YRS, R/O.PEDAPATAN.AM AGRAHARAM D/O.DAKE VNKANNA, PEDAPATANAM AGRAHARAM . MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. (3RD RESPONDENT IS BEING MINOR REP. BY 2ND RESPONDENT GUARDIAN/MOTHER) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the order dated 2 14.05.2019 in CRL.Revision Petition. No. 132 /2016 on the file of the court of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Amalapuram IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuant the order dated 14.05.2019 in CRL.Revision Petition.No.132 /2016 on the file of the court of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Amalapuram pending disposal of criminal petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. GANGISETTY RAVEENA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: On 18.04.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, when the matter was listed on 31.07.2025, there was again no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and this Court directed that the matter be listed on 04.08.2025 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Subsequently, when the matter was listed on 19.06.2026 under the same caption, there was again no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. It appears that the petitioner or the petitioner’s counsel are not evincing any interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 03-07-2026 BMS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑