Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41998 (CAL)

NAMITA KARAR & ORS v. SANKAR GHOSH

CO/134/2017 · 2026-09-22

Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 7+8 22.09.2026 Court No.551 B.K.N C.O. 134 of 2017 With CAN 1 of 2017 (Old CAN 7506 of 2017) Namita Karar & Ors. Vs. Sri Sankar Ghosh, since deceased, rep. by Rinku Ghosh & Ors. With C.O. 137 of 2017 With CAN 1 of 2017 (Old CAN 7507 of 2017) Namita Karar & Ors. Vs. Sri Sankar Ghosh, since deceased, rep. by Rinku Ghosh Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, Mr. Kaustav Bhattacharya … for the Opposite Parties. 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Opposite parties are represented. 3. It transpires from the record that none has appeared for the petitioner on 7th August, 2026 and 7th September, 2026. Although learned advocate for the opposite parties were present on such dates. 4. The instant revisional application has been filed assailing an order dated 22nd March, 2016 in Title Appeal No. 20 of 2016 and Title Appeal No. 21 of 2016 by which an application under Section 151 of the Code Civil Procedure filed on behalf of the appellants in such appeals was rejected. 5. In such circumstances, C.O. No. 134 of 2017 and C.O. No. 137 of 2017 are dismissed in default. 2 6. Connected applications are also dismissed for default. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)