Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2729 RFA No. 2160 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2160 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN:
SMT. MAMATHA.R W/O LATE V.SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R.AT NO.1, 1ST CROSS, NARAYANA REDDY LAYOUT, HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD, BANASAWADI, BENGALURU - 560 043. …APPELLANT (BY SMT.K.B.JAYALAKSHMI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
SMT. K.M.LATHA ALIAS LATHA SATHYANARAYANA, W/O T.S.SATHYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO. 30/20, 7TH CROSS, SHATHI GANAPATHY NAGAR, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 079.
2.
V.PRAKASH KUMAR S/O LATE H.VENKATESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.1, 1ST CROSS, B.Y.NARAYANA REDDY LAYOUT, HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD, BANASAWADI, BENGALURU - 43. …RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH RULE 1 OF ORDER XLI OF THE CPC, 1908.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2729 RFA No. 2160 of 2023
ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed on 10.01.2025, on that day, finally two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non- compliance of office objections’ on 22.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 10.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10