Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4195 (CHH)

SMT. MADHURI DUBEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2148/2021 · 2026-04-01

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15222 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2148 of 2021 1 - Smt. Madhuri Dubey W/o Shri Rajkumar Dubey Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- Ganeshpur, Post- Silphili, Police Station- Jainagar, Up- Tehsil- Vishrampur, Tehsil- Surajpur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Additional Collector Surguja, District-Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Superintendent Land Record Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 4 - Manoj Singh Bhadoriya S/o Ramdayal Singh Aged About 54 Years R/o Kedarpur, Mission Chowk, Ring Road, Ambikapur, P.S.- Gandhi Nagar, Tehsil- Ambikapur, District- Balrampur, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ujjawal Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Dashrath Prajapti, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Siddharth Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 02/04/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the order passed by respondent no.2 in Revenue Case No. Revision16 A-12/2020-21 dated 23.2.20 & separate order dtd. 17.2.2021/23.2.2021 (Ann. P/1), in the ends of justice. 10.2 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper be awarded in favor of the petitioner, including cost.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat