Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41939 (KAR)

SMT. LAKSHMINARASAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/4948/2020 · 2026-09-23

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010291912020 NC: 2026:KHC:52596 CRL.P No. 4948 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4948 OF 2020 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMINARASAMMA, w/O LATE ANJINAPA, AGE ABOUT 72 YEARS, 2. SRI. GOPALAPPA, S/O LATE ANJINAPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. SRI. RAMACHANDRAPPA, S/O LATE ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF KAMMASANDRA VILLAGE, SULLIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT BANGALORE - 562 114. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHANNARAYAPATNA POLICE STATION, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 135. REP BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010291912020 NC: 2026:KHC:52596 CRL.P No. 4948 of 2020 2. SRI. MUNIYAPPA, S/O LATE CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATTANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE - 562 135. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SUHAS GOWDA M, HCGP FOR R1/STATE, SRI. M.V. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE REGISTRATION OF CASE IN CR.NO.50/2020 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 420, 465, 468, 471 R/W 34 OF IPC AGAINST THEM ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND J.M.F.C., DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, IN SO FAR AS IT RELEATES TO THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks time and learned counsel for the respondent No.1/State submits that police have already investigated the matter and filed the charge sheet. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010291912020 NC: 2026:KHC:52596 CRL.P No. 4948 of 2020 The relief sought for in the petition is only for quashing of FIR. In view of filing of the charge sheet, the petition has become infructuous. Hence, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Court, if any they have any grievance against the charge sheet. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30