Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41929 (KAR)

SRI VENKATAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS SRI. C NARAYANASWAMY v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/1317/2025 · 2026-09-21

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010021392025 NC: 2026:KHC:51800 WP No. 1317 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 1317 OF 2025 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VENKATAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S SRI. C NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. 2. SMT. BHAGYAMMA D/O LATE VENKATAPPA W/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NALLIMARADAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. PIN CODE-562 105. 3. SMT. PARVATHAMMA D/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT -562 110. 4. SRI RAMESH.V. S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AND LATE SMT. RAJAMMA Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010021392025 NC: 2026:KHC:51800 WP No. 1317 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT, K.G. PURA JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT -562 102. 5. SMT. LEELAVATHI D/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AND LATE RAJAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT KADISEEGANAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. UMESH B.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT OFFICE AT, ZILLADALITHA BHAVANA 1ST FLOOR, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 562 110. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB- DIVISION BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. OFFICE AT, ZILLADALITHA BHAVANA 1ST FLOOR, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK. BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. PIN CODE - 562 110. 3. THE TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK. DEVANAHALLI - 562 110. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010021392025 NC: 2026:KHC:51800 WP No. 1317 of 2025 4. SMT. CHIKKAMUNIYAMMA W/O LATE, DODDAMUNIVENKATAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HER LR.S SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE, DODDAMUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 5. SRI. C.D.NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE, DODDAMUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 LEGAL HAIRS OF SMT. CHIKKAMUNIYAMMA AND R/AT CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI- TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. SMT. SAKAMMA S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVENKATAPPA DEAD BY HER LR.S 6. SRI. MUNIKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 7. SRI. C. MUNIRAJU. S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESPONDENTS 6 AND 7 LEGAL HEIRS OF SMT SAKAMMA R/AT CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI- TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT- 562 110. 8. SRI. SRINIVAS S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010021392025 NC: 2026:KHC:51800 WP No. 1317 of 2025 R/AT CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI- TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. 9. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB), NO. 49, KHANIJA BHAVANA, EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE-1 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. MANJUNATHA K.V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJESWARA P.N., ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7; R8 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R9) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Umesh,B.N., counsel for the petitioners; Smt.Savithramma, AGA for respondent Nos.1 to 3; Sri.Manjunatha.K.V., counsel on behalf of Sri.Rajeswara.P.N., - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010021392025 NC: 2026:KHC:51800 WP No. 1317 of 2025 for respondents 4 to 7 and Sri.P.V.Chandrashekar counsel for respondent No.9, appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that memo has been filed stating that the matter is settled out of the Court. Hence, the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. Submission is noted. Memo is placed on record. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 67