THE KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD v. SRI. B. JAYANNA
CRL.P/2799/2020 · 2026-09-21
H P Sandesh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 41917 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 41917 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010179962020 NC: 2026:KHC:51915 CRL.P No. 2799 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2799 OF 2020 BETWEEN:
THE KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD BY ITS ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER REGIONAL OFFICE SRI GOVINDA NILAYA, 1ST PARALLEL ROAD DURGIGUDI, SHIMOGGA (AT PRESENT NO.156 AUTO COMPLEX INDUSTRIAL AREA SAGAR ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JEEVAN J NEERALGI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI. B. JAYANNA COMMISSIONER (RETD) SHIVAMOGGA CITY MUNICIPALITY (NOW SHIVAMOGGA CITY CORPORATION) SHIVAMOGGA-577201
2.
SHIVAMOGGA CITY MUNICIPALITY (NOW SHIVAMOGGA CITY CORPORATION) SHIVAMOGGA-577201 (REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHWIN S HALADY, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH OR SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.02.2019
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010179962020 NC: 2026:KHC:51915 CRL.P No. 2799 of 2020
PASSED BY THE COURT OF III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIVAMOGGA, IN C.C.NO.3824/2009 DISCHARGING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
2. This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying this Court to quash the impugned order dated 11.02.2019 passed in C.C.No.3824/2009 in discharging respondent No.1 by the III Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Shivamogga. When the Trial Court discharged the accused, the same is amenable for revisional jurisdiction and the same is not exercised by the counsel for the petitioner and filed the petition seeking for quashing of the said order. Hence, the petition is dismissed with liberty to seek an appropriate remedy if petitioner chose to do so.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN