BALLU URF BALRAM S/O PHOOLCHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3074/2026 · 2026-03-23
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4191 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4191 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12033] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3074/2026 Ballu Urf Balram S/o Phoolchand, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kadarpura, Police Station Bapcha, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA Mr. Ronak Verma Mr. Avadhesh Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 23/03/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.01/2026 registered at Police Station Bapcha, District Baran for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), and 3(5) BNS-2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.He further submits that as per the medical report, only two injuries have been caused to injured Kajod Lal, out of which one is simple in nature and another is grievous.He argued that there is no materiel on record by which it can be inferred that the above injuries are dangerous to life. He
[2026:RJ-JP:12033] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3074/2026] again submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 27.01.2026 without any criminal past, the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ballu Urf Balram S/o Phoolchand, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/62