[2026:RJ-JP:11422] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4868/2026 Smt. Babli Yadav W/o Shri Ramkaran Yadav, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Dhani Heerawali, Village And Post Manaksas, Via Sarai Surpura, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jhunjhunu Depot, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ravi Jangir on behalf of Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 18/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner is that although the petitioner has been regularly working on the post of Conductor in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, however, salary has been withheld since November, 2025, without passing any order to this effect. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the controversy was earlier considered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition [2026:RJ-JP:11422] (2 of 2) [CW-4868/2026] No.2387/2026 (Mohammad Ekrar Vs. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.) decided on 11.02.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner may also given liberty to make a representation in the light of order dated 11.02.2026 passed in the case of Mohammad Ekrar (supra). 4. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation before the respondent No.2, who shall consider and decide the representation by a speaking order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation order along with a certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/11