- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010644032026 NC: 2026:KHC:51964 WP NO.29433 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.29433 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SHAMSHAD BI W/O LATE ASLAM PASHA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 2. MOHAMMED ISMAIL S/O LATE ASLAM PASHA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. 3. AYESHA BEE D/O LATE ASLAM PASHA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 4. MUBIN TAJ S/O LATE AMEERJAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 5. AJAS W/O LATE AMEERJAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 6. FYROZ PASHA S/O LATE AMEERJAN, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 7. AFROZ PASHA S/O LATE AMEERJAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 8. MEHABOOB PASHA S/O LATE AMEERJAN, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT: Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010644032026 NC: 2026:KHC:51964 WP NO.29433 OF 2026 NO.1019, HOODI, THIMMAREDDY LAYOUT, OPP. FLORENCE PUBLIC SCHOOL, BASAVANAGAR MAIN ROAD, POST MAHADEVAPURA, WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU - 560 048. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUDESH KUMAR ACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 036. 3. MANJUNATH SHETTY S/O LATE LAKSHMI NARAYANA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT HOODI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 048. …RESPONDENTS THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 21ST APRIL, 2026 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.12114/2026 AND RESTORE THE WRIT PETITION TO ITS FILE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010644032026 NC: 2026:KHC:51964 WP NO.29433 OF 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for petitioners submitted that the petitioners are seeking review of the order dated 21st April, 2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.12114/2026, however, by oversight, it was registered as Writ Petition instead of Review Petition. 2. In this connection, learned counsel appearing for petitioners filed Memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to convert the writ petition as review petition. 3. Accepting the Memo filed by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, registry is directed to convert the present writ petition as review petition and post before the appropriate Bench. 4. In view of the above, for the statistical purpose, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1