- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15843 CRL.RP No. 730 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 9 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.730 OF 2022 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.9 OF 2024 IN CRL.RP No. 730/2022 BETWEEN: MR R ASHOK KUMAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE J RATHANLAL FLAT BEARING NO. TF1, 3RD FLOOR, BUILDING NO. 84/85 2ND MAIN ROAD, PALACE GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 003 &PETITIONER (BY SRI. D PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR JAIN S/O SRI JUDRAJ VANASHAJI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.14/06, BAFNA APARTMENTS, FLAT NO.202, 2ND FLOOR, JAIN TEMPLE ROAD, V V PURAM BENGALURU - 560 004 &RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PRATHIBHA K M, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 15.01.2021 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1296/2019, PASSED BY Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15843 CRL.RP No. 730 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 9 of 2024 THE HON9BLE LXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-76), AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 27.04.2019 IN C.C.NO.29708/2017, PASSED BY THE HON9BLE XII ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU. IN CRL.RP No.9/2024 BETWEEN: MR R ASHOK KUMAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE J RATHANLAL FLAT BEARING NO.TF1, 3RD FLOOR, BUILDING NO.84/85 2ND MAIN ROAD, PALACE GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 003 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. D PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR JAIN S/O SRI JUDRAJ VANASHAJI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.14/06, BAFNA APARTMENTS, FLAT NO.202, 2ND FLOOR, JAIN TEMPLE ROAD, V V PURAM BENGALURU - 560 004 ...RESPONDENT (BY SMT.PRATHIBHA K M, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 15.01.2021 IN CRL.A.NO.1295/2019 PASSED BY THE LXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-76) AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 27.04.2019 IN C.C.NO.26429/2017 PASSED BY THE XII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15843 CRL.RP No. 730 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 9 of 2024 THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Joint memo filed. Joint memo reads as under: <The petitioner and the respondent have reached to compromise on the following terms: 1. That the petitioner has agreed to pay the cheque amount in a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- in both the cases put together and the respondent has agreed to receive the said amount towards full and final settlement. 2. The petitioner has deposited in all sum of Rs.80,000/- before the Trial Court in respect of both the cases upon securing the suspension of the sentence. 3. The respondent may be permitted to receive the said sum of Rs.80,000/- from the Trial Court. 4. That the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- today. The petitioner undertakes to pay the balance amount of Rs.2,20,000/- as under: a. On or before 10th April 2026 Rs.1,00,000/-. b. On or before 30th April 2026 Rs.1,20,000/-. Wherefore, the petitioner and respondent most humbly prays to accept the joint memo and set aside - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15843 CRL.RP No. 730 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 9 of 2024 the conviction passed against the petitioner in the interest of justice and equity.= 2. Rs.75,000/- is said to have been transferred by the revision petitioner to the respondent through Phone Pay mobile app and Rs.25,000/- by cash, today. 3. Revision petitioner shall adhere to the terms of the joint memo and pay the agreed amount in respect of the cheques in question which are submitted in respect of these two revision petitions only. 4. If there is default in payment of the amount as agreed in the joint memo, revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the Trial Court confirmed by the First Appellate Court. 5. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. 6. Revision petitions are disposed of, accordingly. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24