Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 23284 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 23284 of 2026 V.Dhanasekaran ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District Collector, Tirupathur District, Tirupathur. 2. The Sub-Collector, Tirupathur district, tirupathur. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Tirupathur District, Tirupathur. 4. The Revenue District Officer, vaniyambadi, Tirupathur. 5. The Tahsildar, vaniyambadi taluk, tirupathur. 6. Revenue Inspector, Alangayam, tirupathur. 7. Village Administrative Officer, Vellakuttai, Tirupathur. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 4th respondent to consider and pass order on the petitioner’s representation dated 06.01.2025 and to order to add survey no.387/4 situated in vellakuttai village, vaniyambadi taluk to an extent of 6.00 ares in computerized patta no.1841 issued in favour of petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 23284 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Mohanapriya For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 06.01.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 06.01.2025 before the respondents to add survey No.387/4 situated in vellakuttai village, vaniyambadi taluk to an extent of 6.00 ares in computerized patta no.1841 issued on his favour. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 06.01.2025 will be considered within a period of two weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 23284 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 directs the fifth respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2025, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 23284 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM To:
1. The District Collector, Tirupathur District, Tirupathur. 2. The Sub-Collector, Tirupathur district, tirupathur. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Tirupathur District, Tirupathur. 4. The Revenue District Officer, vaniyambadi, Tirupathur. 5. The Tahsildar, vaniyambadi taluk, tirupathur. 6. Revenue Inspector, Alangayam, tirupathur. 7. village administrative officer vellakuttai, tirupathur. WP No. 23284 of 2026 19-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis