Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4184 (BOM)

Maruti So Laxman Jagtap died through LRS v. The Executive Engineer

CA/9087/2026 · 2026-08-20

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 965...odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9087 OF 2026 IN FAST/26880/2024 MARUTI SO LAXMAN JAGTAP DIED THROUGH LRS VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SINA KOLEGAON PROJECT, PARANDA DIST. OSMANABAD ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Undre Vikram Shivaji (through V.C.) Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Madhav N. Kalyane h/f. Mr. Gulab B. Rajale AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : Ms. V.S. Chaudhary … CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 20th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. This Application is filed by the Claimant who is Respondent in Appeal filed by the acquiring body. 2. It is submitted by the leaned Advocate for the Applicant who appears through Video Conferencing, that the Claimant i.e. Respondent no. 1 – Maruti Laxman Jagtap, in the Appeal has expired on 04.04.2025. Therefore, his legal heirs are necessary to be brought on record. He is represented by Applicant nos. 1/A to 1/C who are legal heirs of deceased/Respondent and are necessary to brought on record, hence this Application. 2 965...odt 3. The Applicant has tendered the death certificate of Respondent no. 1 as well as the legal heirship certificate which shows the names of legal heirs. 4. The delay of 390 days in filing the Application is condoned. In view of the aforesaid, the Application is allowed. The legal heirs shall be brought on record. 5. The Application is allowed. 6. The Appellant / acquiring body shall make necessary amendment in the First Appeal as well as the accompanying Applications within a period of two weeks. 7. List the matter on 03.09.2026. ( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ) SPC