Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010485222014 NC: 2026:KHC:52686 RSA No. 419 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 419 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI JAYA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
2.
SMT.JAYANTHI POOJARTHI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
3.
SRI VIJAYA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
4.
SRI.JAYANTHA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
5.
SMT.LAXMI POOJARY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
6.
SMT. YASHODHA POOJARTHI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
APPELLANTS ARE THE CHILDREN OF
LATE SRI. BABU POOJARY
AND ALL RESIDING AT SANKALAKARIYA, MUNDKOOR POST, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576 121. ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K. CHANDRAKANTH ARIGA, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by VANDANA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010485222014 NC: 2026:KHC:52686 RSA No. 419 of 2014
AND:
SMT INDIRA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, D/O LATE DEVAKI SHEDTHI, RESIDING AT MUNDKOOR DODDAMANE HOUSE, SANKALA KARIYA, MUNDKOOR,KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-576 121. …RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT – SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 8.1.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.25/2006 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ACJM, KARKALA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 24.11.2005 PASSED IN OS.NO.4/2002 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE(JR.DN.), KARKALA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010485222014 NC: 2026:KHC:52686 RSA No. 419 of 2014
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for the appellants has filed a memo stating that the parties have settled the dispute. Memo reads as hereunder:
“The suit filed by the father of the appellants against the defendant is one for permanent injunction in regard to the passage. The parties to the suit had settled their disputes between themselves by the respondent selling the property in dispute to give way of 10 ft width of road to the appellants. A copy of the sale agreement dated 12.06.2022 is filed herewith. In view of the above the appeal may be disposed off.”
Memo is placed on record.
The appeal is disposed of as settled out of Court.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BVV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 67