Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4183 (ALL)

GOLDEN SAHNI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/6705/2026 · 2026-05-04

Lakshmi Kant Shukla, Rajiv Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6705 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State, Mr. Rufaid Imtiaz, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been forwarded against the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts but states that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. May 5, 2026 Brijesh Maurya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Kumar Sahani, Narendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Kritika Sinha, Mayanka Srivastava, Rufaid Imtiaz, Shardool Agrahari (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Golden Sahni .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad