18.09.2026 Court No.28 Item No.3 ssi CRA (SB) 128 of 2026 (via video conference) In Re: An application under Section 14-A (2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 in connection with Sessions (P) Case No. 63 of 2025, arising out of CBI, SCB, Kolkata Case No. RC 0562024S0004 of 2024 dated 16.02.2024 under Sections 363/365/34/368/370/120B/376 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and under Section 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and under Section 9 and 10 of Protection of Child Marriage Act. In the matter of : Sarmila Begam Khatun @ Maju Ki Bibi @ Sarmila Begum … appellant Mr. Sk. Salim Mr. Anesh Tiwari … for the appellant Mr. Amajit De, Spl. PP, CBI … for the CBI Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant does not want to press this appeal. He relies on the written instruction issued by the executant/sister of the appellant in this regard. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the CBI submits that earlier an application filed on behalf of the appellant was rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 23.02.2026. This appeal challenges an order dated 03.07.2026 passed by the learned Judge Exclusive (POCSO) Court, Purba Bardhaman Sadar in connection with Sessions (P) Case No. 63 of 2025, thereby rejecting the prayer for bail made on behalf of the appellant. 2 The present application is under Section 14-A (2) of the SC & ST (POA) Act and the same does not relate to the restrictions contained in Section 484 of the Cr.PC corresponding to Section 425 of the BNSS as regards summary dismissal of an appeal. Therefore, on the prayer of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, the appeal being CRA (SB) 128 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.)