IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84918 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1282 Year-2024 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Shashikant Kumar @ Shashi Kant Rai Son of Shiv Sahankar Rai R/o Village- Hasanpur Osti, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad- A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 18-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351, 352, 76, 303(2) of the B.N.S. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons came and on orders of Shiv Shankar Rai, accused Chandan assaulted her husband by sword causing injury on neck and head, thereafter Shiv Shankar Rai assaulted Rahul by sword causing injury on finger and petitioner dashed the informant on ground and disrobed her. Further, Punam snatched Rs.7500/- from the pocket of her Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84918 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/3 husband. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that thrust of the allegation is against Chandan, who is alleged to have assaulted the husband of the informant on head and neck and he got seven stitches. It is further submitted that petitioner is not alleged to have assaulted either Rahul or the husband of the informant. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is not a criminal and allegation of dashing the informant and disrobing is ornamental in nature. 5. Learned A.P.P. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Mahua P. S. Case No.1282 of 2024, subject to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84918 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026 3/3 the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 7. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T