Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41808 (KAR)

SRI K S KUMAR v. SHIDDARAMAPPA

RFA/822/2020 · 2026-09-22

S Rachaiah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010130432020 NC: 2026:KHC:52159 RFA No. 822 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 822 OF 2020 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.K.S.KUMAR S/O SHIDDARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O KATIGENERE VILLAGE AJJAMPURE HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKMAGALORE DIST – 577 228 NOW R/O CHIKKAGANGUR VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE DIST – 577 213 2. SMT.SHAKUNTHALA W/O SRI.NEELANDHARA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT KATHIGENERE VILLAGE AJJAMPURA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK CHICKMAGALUR DIST – 577 228 … APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MUNIYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHIDDARAMAPPA S/O BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS 2. KAMALAMMA Digitally signed by SUSHMA LAKSHMI B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010130432020 NC: 2026:KHC:52159 RFA No. 822 of 2020 W/O SHIDDARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 3. DEVENDRAPPA S/O SIDDARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 4. NAGARAJA S/O SIDDARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 5. SACHIN D. S/O DEVENDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 6. SANJAY D. S/O DEVENDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 6 ARE AGRICULTURISTS R/O KATIGENERE VILLAGE AJJAMPURE HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK CHICKMAGALORE DIST – 577 228 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.NAGARAJA R.C., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R6) ---- THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2019 PASSED IN OS.NO.5/2019 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT CHANNAGIRI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR “TO COMPLY THE ORDER OF DIVISION BENCH”, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010130432020 NC: 2026:KHC:52159 RFA No. 822 of 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo of even date seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Considering the same, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, does not survive for consideration and the same is also disposed of. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE BSS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47