HENJENSON D. SANGMA v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS.
WP(C)/213/2026 · 2026-07-06
H S Thangkhiew
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 418 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 418 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Serial No.26 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 213 of 2026
Date of Decision: 06.07.2026
Shri. Henjenson D. Sangma, S/o. Inding R. Marak, R/o Nangapa Koksi Songma, P.O. Songsak, P.S. Dagal Apal East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by its Commissioner & Secretary, Community & Rural Development, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. The Director, Community & Rural Development, Meghalaya, Shillong.
3. The Joint Director, Community & Rural Development, Meghalaya, Shillong.
4. The Deputy Commissioner, Nort Garo Hills District, Resubelpara.
5. The Block Development Officer (BDO), Kharkutta Development Block, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
2026:MLHC:659
2
6. The Financial Advisor (FA), I/c Community & Rural Development Department, Meghalaya, Shillong.
7. The Finance & Accounts Officer (FAO) Directorate of Community & Rural Development, Shillong, Meghalaya.
8. The Treasury Officer, Treasury Office, Resubelpara, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
9. The Accountant General (A&E), Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
…Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. A.G.Momin, Adv.
Ms. L.D.Sangma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. H.Abraham, GA for R 1-8.
None for R 9.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
2026:MLHC:659
3
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Though Mr. H.Abraham, learned GA for the respondents No. 1-8, has submitted that he has just received instructions and affidavit has been prepared, however, Mr. A.G.Momin, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous as the writ petitioner has since received all his retirement benefits.
2. Accordingly, on these submissions, the writ petition stands closed and
disposed of.
Judge
2026:MLHC:659 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.07.06 15:51:08 IST