- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010659452026 NC: 2026:KHC:52975 WP No. 30041 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 30041 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA C/O. LATE R.S. SIDDALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 2. SRI R.S. SUJENDRA S/O. LATE R.S. SIDDALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 3. SRI R.S. SHYAM S/O. LATE R.S. SIDDALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.628, 9TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, VINAYA MARGA, SIDDHARTHANAGAR, MYSURU CITY, MYSURU. 570001 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI MALLIKARJUN N.K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI M.S. KRISHNA S/O. LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT RAGI MUDDANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHINAKURULI HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. 571434 …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010659452026 NC: 2026:KHC:52975 WP No. 30041 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 03-09-2026 PASSED IN O.S.NO.298/2021 BY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SRIRANGAPATNA, VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER The present petition is filed impugning the order dated 03.09.2026, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) came to be allowed, permitting amendment of the plaint. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the earlier suit was filed only for the relief of injunction and, subsequently, the plaint was sought to be amended to incorporate the relief of declaration. It is contended that, while permitting the amendment of the prayer, the trial Court has not made any observation with regard to the plea of limitation insofar as the declaratory reliefs are concerned. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010659452026 NC: 2026:KHC:52975 WP No. 30041 of 2026 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. It is a settled position of law that, when an amendment is permitted, any right accrued in favour of the other parties by virtue of the law of limitation is also required to be permitted to be raised in the suit. In that view of the matter, without interfering with the order impugned, it is observed that the petitioners are at liberty to raise the plea of limitation insofar as the amended prayer is concerned. 5. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43