Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4178 (AP)

NACHUKA VEMULAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9375/2020 · 2026-07-02

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010152372020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 9375/2020 Between: 1. NACHUKA VEMULAMMA, W/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. RAMASINGAVARAM VILLAGE, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and 2 enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac. 2.81 cts in S. No. 323-1 of I.S. Jagannathapuram village, Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal, West Godavari District and trying to dispossess the petitioner without putting the petitioner on notice or giving an opportunity or following the procedure contemplated under law or taking recourse to the Land Acquisition or requisition proceedings, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently forbear the respondents from interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the aforesaid land by the petitioner, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac. 2.81 cts in S. No. 323-1 of I.S. Jagannathapuram village, Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal, West Godavari District by dispossession or otherwise, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to vacate the interim order granted on 28-05-2020 in WP. 9375/2020 and dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.9375 of 2020 O R DE R: Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedies. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the alternative remedies. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.07.2026 KLP Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable