Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4177 (CHH)

SUNITA ATHWANI v. KANTA DEVI Jain

FA/420/2019 · 2026-04-08

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16414 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 420 of 2019 Sunita Athwani W/o Shri Rakesh Athwani, Age 44 Years, Through General Power Of Attorney Holder Kapil Athwani S/o Shri Rangulal Athwani, Age 39 Year, Both R/o Eidgah Bhatha Gali No.6, Beside Of Jhulelal Mandir, Lakhenagar, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus Kanta Devi Jain W/o Vijay Jain R/o C-48/5, Tagore Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Defendant), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Appellant : Shri Sharad Mishra, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri Adhiraj Surana, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 09.04.2026 1. Heard on I.A. No. 05/2026, an application for withdrawal of the appeal. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.04.09 17:03:26 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that during the pendency of the present appeal, the appellant and the respondent have entered into a compromise and have amicably settled their dispute. A copy of the settlement agreement has been annexed as Annexure D/1. 3. It is, therefore, prayed that they be permitted to withdraw the present appeal. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. In view of the reasons stated in the application for withdrawal and considering the fact that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties, as evidenced by the settlement agreement annexed with the application, the prayer deserves to be allowed. 6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in view of the amicable settlement between the parties. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib