Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41765 (CAL)

TANMAY LAYEK AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

RVW/228/2026 · 2026-09-18

Anuj Singh, Rajasekhar Mantha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18.09.2026 Court No.13 Item No.3 pk RVW 228 of 2026 Tanmay Layek and another Vs. State of West Bengal and others Mr. Debjyoti Basu, Mr. Sutosom Bhattacharyya, ...for the appellants. Mr. Sauvik Nandy, Sr. Adv, Mr. Suman Banerjee … for the State. Mr. Indrajeet Dasgupta, Mr. Guddu Singh … for the Union of India. 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on record. 2. Review is sought against the order dated 01.09.2026 on the ground that the petitioners were denied opportunity of participating in counseling in government colleges and hence did not choose private colleges where they were offered internship. 3. This Court is of the view that the said fact was not even argued before this Court. Even assuming for the sake of argument the same was raised, the observations in paragraph 6 of the said order would have been passed in any way. 4. In that view of the matter, RVW 228 of 2026 shall stand dismissed. Consequently, CAN 1 of 2026 is also dismissed. 5. This Court is inclined to impose costs. However, in the facts and circumstance of the case, the petitioners are 2 let off with a warning against filing frivolous applications. 6. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Anuj Singh, J.)