Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41759 (MAD)

Tvl. Goodwill Steels v. State Tax Officer,

WP/19814/2026 · 2026-06-25

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19814 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19814 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.21135 & 21136 of 2026 Tvl. Goodwill Steels Rep. by its Proprietor Mohamed Peer Usmanbabu, No.33/69, Moore Street, Chennai-600 001. ..Petitioner Vs 1. State Tax Officer, Harbour Assessment Circle Integrated complex for Commercial tax Offices, Room No.327, 3rd Floor, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Vepery, Chennai-03. 2. State Bank of India Main Branch, 48, Armenian Street, George Town, Chennai-600 001. ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of impugned order of rejection of application for rectification dated 05.02.2026 bearing Reference No. ZD330226036530V and its annexure together with impugned Order dated 30.07.2024 in Form GST DRC-07 bearing reference No. ZD330724341097F and its annexure both passed by the 1st Respondent in Petitioner’s GSTIN 33AAIPU6253F1ZL for the FY 2019-20 and quash the same to the extent it confirms the tax demand of Rs.34,636/- along with interest and penalty and consequently raise the attachment of Petitioner’s Bank A/c. No. 42915436173 with the 2nd Respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19814 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner: Mr. R Anish Kumar For R1: Mr. R. Sethu Prabakaran Govt. Counsel (Tax) ORDER The petitioner assails an order dated 30.07.2024 on the ground that the petitioner was not provided a personal hearing and a reasonable opportunity to submit supporting documents. 2. Mr. R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a rectification application and the same was rejected on 05.02.2026 without providing an opportunity. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 50% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19814 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned order in the second respondent bank shall stand raised. 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 25-06-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To 1.State Tax Officer, Harbour Assessment Circle Integrated complex for Commercial tax Offices, Room No.327, 3rd Floor, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Vepery, Chennai-03. 2.State Bank of India Main Branch, 48, Armenian Street, George Town, Chennai-600 001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19814 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 19814 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.21135 & 21136 of 2026 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis