N.Vetha Vishakan Managing Director v. T.P.Sathish Immannuvel
CMP/9587/2026 · 2026-06-30
K Govindarajan Thilakavadi, P Velmurugan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 41755 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 41755 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP No. 9587 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR. No.23271 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI CMP No. 9587 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR. No.23271 of 2026 N.Vetha Vishakan Managing Director of M/s. Sri Varsha Auto Agencies Pvt Ltd, Residing at No.11, S.F No 1, Parsan Antara, Nanjundapuram Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore 641 036. and Having Office at No.327-4P, Mettupalayam Road, Gounder Mills Post, Coimbatore 641 029. ..Petitioner(s) Vs T.P.Sathish Immannuvel Director of M/s.K.R.Marketers, Residing at No.139/1C, VCV Street, Vellakinar Village, Coimbatore. and also Residing at No.9, New No.7/60079/82, CPC Sai Avenue, Thadagam Main Road, Nanjundapuram, Pannimadai, Coimbatore 641 108. ..Respondent(s) To condone the delay of 58 days in preferring the appeal against the judgement and decree dated 20-09-2025 passed in C.O.S.No.3 of 2025, on the file of the Commercial Court (District Judge cadre), Coimbatore. For Petitioner(s): Mr. C.Umashankar For Respondent(s): Mr.Saravanan P https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 9587 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR. No.23271 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by P.Velmurugan J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 58 days in preferring the appeal against the judgement and decree dated 20.09.2025 passed in C.O.S.No.3 of 2025, on the file of the Commercial Court (District Judge cadre), Coimbatore.
2. Despite being given sufficient opportunity, the respondent has failed to file a counter-affidavit. Nevertheless, the learned counsel for the respondent raised serious objections to the condonation of delay.
3. This Court, however is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this miscellaneous petition.
4. Therefore, the delay is condoned.
(P.V.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 30-06-2026 KSA-2 Note: Registry is directed to number the Appeal, if the papers are otherwise in
order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 9587 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR. No.23271 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 P.VELMURUGAN, J. AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. KSA-2 CMP No. 9587 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR. No.23271 of 2026 30-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis