Ramamoorthi v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/16215/2026 · 2026-06-25
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 41751 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 41751 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 16215 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 16215 of 2026 Ramamoorthi D.No. 32/5/1030, Keelatheru Sembur, P.N.Palayam Taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police PEW, Attur Police Station, Salem. Crime No.99 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.99 of 2026 on the file of PEW, Attur Police Station, Salem. For Petitioner(s): Mr. T.Ganesan For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE)
ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(C) and 4(1-A) (ii) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2004 in Crime No.99 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16215 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that, he was found in illegal possession of 50 liters of ID arrack and 200 liters of wash. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has no previous cases pending against him. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the
learned counsel on either side and also perused the records available.
6. Considering the seriousness of the allegations and the impact of the alleged offence on society, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner does not deserve the grant of anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16215 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 25-06-2026 DRL To
1. The Inspector of Police PEW, Attur Police Station, Salem. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16215 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 16215 of 2026 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis